<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reviriment de jurisprudenta. Obligatia de a motiva necesitatea schimbarii jurisprudentei. CEDO, 36815/03, Atanasovski vs. Macedonia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juridice.ro/97363/reviriment-de-jurisprudenta-obligatia-de-a-motiva-necesitatea-schimbarii-jurisprudentei-cedo-36815-03-atanasovski-vs-macedonia.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juridice.ro/97363/reviriment-de-jurisprudenta-obligatia-de-a-motiva-necesitatea-schimbarii-jurisprudentei-cedo-36815-03-atanasovski-vs-macedonia.html</link>
	<description>in Law we Trust</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:47:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
</channel>
</rss>

