<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JURIDICE.ro &#187; Alis Patlageanu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juridice.ro/tag/alis-patlageanu/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juridice.ro</link>
	<description>in Law we Trust</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Interpretarea CJCE cu privire la recunoasterea principiilor generale de drept la nivel comunitar</title>
		<link>http://www.juridice.ro/88960/interpretarea-cjce-cu-privire-la-recunoasterea-principiilor-generale-de-drept-la-nivel-comunitar.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.juridice.ro/88960/interpretarea-cjce-cu-privire-la-recunoasterea-principiilor-generale-de-drept-la-nivel-comunitar.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Juridice.ro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curtea de Justitie a Uniunii Europene (CJUE)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dreptul Uniunii Europene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revista de note si studii juridice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alis Patlageanu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rodica Procop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juridice.ro/?p=88960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Plecand de la decizia CJCE in cauza Audiolux si altii [1], analiza noastra va privi modul in care Curtea a interpretat notiunea de principii ale dreptului comunitar in jurisprudenta sa. De asemenea, vom considera ca punct de plecare si constatarea ca in prezent, desi exista opinii doctrinare diferite, chiar divergente, in ceea ce priveste [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.juridice.ro/88960/interpretarea-cjce-cu-privire-la-recunoasterea-principiilor-generale-de-drept-la-nivel-comunitar.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protectia actionarilor minoritari ca principiu al dreptului comunitar. Inexistenta. Hotararea CJCE C-101/08 in cauza Audiolux si altii</title>
		<link>http://www.juridice.ro/88018/protectia-actionarilor-minoritari-ca-principiu-al-dreptului-comunitar-inexistenta-hotararea-cjce-c-101-08-in-cauza-audiolux-si-altii.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.juridice.ro/88018/protectia-actionarilor-minoritari-ca-principiu-al-dreptului-comunitar-inexistenta-hotararea-cjce-c-101-08-in-cauza-audiolux-si-altii.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Juridice.ro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curtea de Justitie a Uniunii Europene (CJUE)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alis Patlageanu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dragomir & Asociatii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreptul societatilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rodica Procop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juridice.ro/?p=88018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In urma mai multor tranzactii, GBL a cedat participatia sa de 30% la capitalul societatii comerciale RTL in favoarea Bertelsmann (actionar ce detinea 37% din capitalul social al RTL) in schimbul a 25% din capitalul acesteia din urma. Ulterior, Bertelsmann a dobandit participatia de 22% din capitalul social al RTL detinuta de Pearson Television, iar [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.juridice.ro/88018/protectia-actionarilor-minoritari-ca-principiu-al-dreptului-comunitar-inexistenta-hotararea-cjce-c-101-08-in-cauza-audiolux-si-altii.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

