BusinessAchiziţii publiceAfaceri transfrontaliereAsigurăriBankingConcurenţăConstrucţiiCorporateComercialEnergieFiscalitateFuziuni & AchiziţiiGamblingHealth & PharmaInfrastructurăInsolvenţăMedia & publicitatePiaţa de capitalIPTelecom
ProtectiveData protectionDreptul familieiDreptul munciiDreptul sportuluiProtecţia consumatorilorProtecţia mediului
LitigationArbitrajContencios administrativContravenţiiDrept penalMediereProcedură civilăRecuperare creanţe
 
Banking
DezbateriCărţiProfesionişti
CMS CMK
STOICA & Asociatii
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Regulating Unfair Banking Practice in Europe. The Case of Personal Suretyships | Aurelia Colombi Ciacchi, Stephen Weatherill

14.11.2011 | JURIDICE.ro
Abonare newsletter

Editura Themis Cart, partener al Oxford University Press, anunta aparitia lucrarii Regulating Unfair Banking Practice in Europe. The Case of Personal Suretyships. Edited by Aurelia Colombi Ciacchi and Stephen Weatherill

Pentru comenzi office@themis.ro

* Analyzes the law and economic context of surety-ships in 22 EU Member States, paving the way for potential legal reform and harmonization
* Clear layout and common structure allows for easy comparisons between jurisdictions
* Offers a comparative perspective of fairness across the jurisdictions of the EU, allowing for further analysis of European banking practices
Private persons often stand surety for a business debt incurred by family members, friends, or employers. These surety-ships are commonly banking guarantees contracted by means of standard terms. Sometimes the guarantor signs the contract while he/she is not aware of the financial risk related to the guarantee. He or she may not even know what a surety-ship is. But in other circumstances the guarantor may be well aware of the risk, but may nonetheless assume it because of strong emotional ties which exist between him/her and the main debtor. How, then, (if at all) does the law address the potential for ‘unfairness’ in such situations?
Some systems choose to rely on objective criteria, such as identification of a manifest disproportion between the guaranteed amount and the surety’s income and assets, while others are more open to subjective inquiry. The key point is variation. Different jurisdictions in Europe operate different models with different priorities.
This book provides a comparative overview of the remedies against unfair obligations of non-professional guarantors available in 22 EU Member States, based on a questionnaire which has been completed by an expert in each particular jurisdiction and covering both legal rules and the economic context of different credit markets and banking practices.
Readership: Scholars and practitioners of banking law, and comparative private law.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1: A. Colombi Ciacchi and S. Weatherill: Regulating Unfair Surety-ships in Europe: Methodology of a Comparative Study
2: K. Heine and R. Janal: Suretyships and Consumer Protection in the European Union through the Lense of Law and Economics
3: A. Colombi Ciacchi and S. Weatherill: Remarks from a Comparative and EU Perspective
Country Reports
4: W. Faber: Austria
5: V. Sagaert: Belgium
6: M. M. Fogt: Denmark
7: L. Fox O’Mahony, J. Devenney and M. Kenny: England and Wales
8: I. Kull: Estonia
9: T. Mikkola: Finland
10: S. Vigneron, A.-S. Barthez and R. Family: France
11: P. Rott: Germany
12: Y. Erifillidis: Greece
13: T. Tajti: Hungary
14: P. O’Callaghan and Aoife O’Donoghue: Ireland
15: F. Fiorentini: Italy
16: T. Klauberg: Latvia
17: A. Smaliukas and G. Sulija: Lithuania
18: M. Haentjens: The Netherlands
19: I. Lobocka: Poland
20: J.F. Sinde Monteiro and A. Pereira: Portugal
21: Florin Ciutacu: Romania
22: L.J. Smith: Scotland
23: S. Meznar: Slovenia
24: T. Rodriguez de las Heras Ballell: Spain
25: A. Persson: Sweden”

Pentru comenzi office@themis.ro

Abonare newsletter

Aflaţi mai mult despre ,
JURIDICE.ro utilizează şi recomandă SmartBill pentru facturare.

JURIDICE.ro este o platformă de exprimare. Publicăm şi opinii cu care nu suntem de acord. Publicarea nu semnifică asumarea de către noi a mesajului. Pentru a publica şi dumneavoastră pe JURIDICE.ro, vă rugăm să citiţi Politica noastră şi Condiţiile de publicare.

Lasă un răspuns

Acest sit folosește Akismet pentru a reduce spamul. Află cum sunt procesate datele comentariilor tale.

Important: Descurajăm publicarea de comentarii defăimatoare. Vor fi validate doar comentariile care respectă Politica JURIDICE.ro şi Condiţiile de publicare.

CariereCărţiEvenimenteProfesioniştiRomanian Lawyers Week